Trauma Assessment by Impact of Event Scale- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theTrauma Assessment by Impact of Event Scale. Answer: Introduction A trauma can be of lifetime, as it holds the power to haunt the conscious and subconscious of a particular individual for a long period of time. A traumatic event can be defined as any event or incident that has potentially caused the individual pain or distress and in most cases a trauma is recurrent, haunting that individual for even after the traumatic event has long past. However it has to be understood recurring effects of a trauma can be really detrimental for the overall psychological health of an individual (Fleisher et al., 2014). There for proper psychological a psychometric evaluation of a particular from other person might be undergoing is extremely essential. Now there are various frameworks and tools for psychological assessment and each one of them has different benefits and downfalls. This assignment we will analyze a particular trauma and the effect it may impact on individuals using the impact of events scale framework or assessment tool. The personal traumatic even t chosen for this assignment is a vehicle crash from my own personal experience that traumatized made from quote a few months in a stretch. Discussion of the stressful event Any stressful romantic event imparts a significant effect on cognitive health, and if that particular traumatizing event incorporates a loss, the effect is even more profound and elemental. On a more elaborative note, the traumatizing isn't that is the vehicle crash happened in the early adulthood of my life while I was travelling with my grandmother and the vehicle that we both were in crashed to another coming from the other side in a head on collision. Accident rented me unconscious for a couple of minutes due to a trauma on the head that I received, however I regain consciousness a couple minutes after I came to know that my grandmother was lying lifeless just a few steps ahead of me and I could not do anything to save her. Do I don't remember much of the panic and cars that followed after the crash the excruciating despair that I felt at the loss of my grandmother is not something that I could forget for a long time. However the reason I chose this traumatizing event for this an alytical an assignment, is the fact that the effect of that trauma had undergone did not leave me for quite a few months after the accident was done with. It needs to be mentioned in this context at aftermath or after effect of traumatizing event can be in various forms. It can manifest as a consistent depression, recurrent nightmares, social isolation, withdrawal and many more. In order to address and eradicate the recurrent or consistent aftermath of a trauma, it is very important to analyze all the factors associated with it. Among the options available, the chosen analytical framework for this assignment is impact of an event scale (Mora et al., 2016). Methods Evaluation of a traumatic event can be very tricky as it incorporates different factors that affect the behaviour and personality traits of a human being. The impact of event scale is one Framework that incorporates all the variables required for assessing and evaluating the contributing factors behind recurrent traumatic event. This analytical Framework was developed in the year of 1979 by famous psychologist Mardi Horowitz, Nancy Williams, and William Alvarez. This Framework is a short set of 15 different questions that has the potential to measure the amount of distress or Paranoia that a person undergoes when associated with the specific traumatic event (Chan et al., 2016). Alto this particular Framework can be utilized to measure the traumatic events of all scales, in clinical settings it is a tool for measuring symptoms and manifestation of post traumatic stress disorder. In this method to the patient is ask a set of 15 questions that relate to the experience and feelings are t he patient has undergone for the past 7 days in order to interpret the severity of post traumatic stress disorder that the patient is undergoing.It has to be mentioned in this context at this frameworks can be quantified into numerical data as there are four variables as answers to each questions and each variable is designated to a particular figure. Hands with this frame work quantitative data and statistical analysis of it is extremely easy which can generate accurate an authentic computable results. Now considering the result of the tool activity or the score to be more precise, is the numerical data that is generated on the basis of each of the numerical data assigned on the basis of the answers that a patient has given in response to each of the questions (Feuerherd et al., 2014). Each of the scores is in a particular range and each range represents a particular outcome. Results and discussion According to the questions of the scale there are different responses to each question, the first response is not at all which indicates no significant effect and is denoted by 0, the second is rarely denoted by 1 referring to little effect. The third and fourth response are sometimes andoften denoted by 2 and 3 respectively referring to increasing intensity of detrimental effect imparted by the traumatising effect (Bienvenu et al., 2013). The resultant score can range from 0 to 75, and the particular score for me had been 30. According to the framework guidelines at this score suggests that the traumatic event had left a powerful impact and I have up to 75% chance of having post traumatic stress disorder. Recommendation While discussing coping strategies for the recovery, a few actions that can be incorporated are: researching and counselling on trauma and PTSD, getting professional counselling help, exercising relaxation methods, exercising distraction techniques, etc (Lai et al., 2014). On a concluding note, it can be said that trauma and its after-effect can be threatening if not addressed. And IES scale can be very important framework for evaluation and assessment of the contributing factors that propel symptoms of recurrent traumatic disorders. And utilization of this framework can be extremely helpful in evaluating the traumatic events and attempt in designing coping strategies. References Bienvenu, O. J., Williams, J. B., Yang, A., Hopkins, R. O., Needham, D. M. (2013). Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of acute lung injury: evaluating the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. CHEST Journal, 144(1), 24-31. Chan, K. S., Friedman, L. A., Bienvenu, O. J., Dinglas, V. D., Cuthbertson, B. H., Porter, R., ... Needham, D. M. (2016). Distribution-based estimates of minimal important difference for hospital anxiety and depression scale and impact of event scale-revised in survivors of acute respiratory failure. General hospital psychiatry, 42, 32-35. Feuerherd, M., Knuth, D., Muehlan, H., Schmidt, S. (2014). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R): Results from a large European study on people with disaster experiences. Traumatology, 20(4), 313. Fleisher, L. A., Fleischmann, K. E., Auerbach, A. D., Barnason, S. A., Beckman, J. A., Bozkurt, B., ... Marine, J. E. (2014). 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation, CIR-0000000000000106. Fox, N., Schwartz, D., Salazar, J. H., Haut, E. R., Dahm, P., Black, J. H., ... Maung, A. A. (2015). Evaluation and management of blunt traumatic aortic injury: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 78(1), 136-146. Lai, Y. H., Lee, Y. H., Chen, Y. R., Hung, Y. J. (2014, October). Psychometric Testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) Chinese Version and Current Status in Three Major Types of Cancer Survivors in Taiwan. In PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (Vol. 23, pp. 156-156). 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA: WILEY-BLACKWELL. Mora, M. C., Wong, K. E., Friderici, J., Bittner, K., Moriarty, K. P., Patterson, L. A., ... Tashjian, D. B. (2016). Operative vs nonoperative management of pediatric blunt pancreatic trauma: evaluation of the National Trauma Data Bank. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 222(6), 977-982.